研究动态
Articles below are published ahead of final publication in an issue. Please cite articles in the following format: authors, (year), title, journal, DOI.

Trastuzumab emtansine vs lapatinib and capecitabine in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer brain metastases: A real-world study. 曲妥珠单抗乳化剂与拉帕替尼和卡培他滨在HER2阳性转移性乳腺癌脑转移中的比较:一项现实世界的研究。

Trastuzumab emtansine vs lapatinib and capecitabine in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer brain metastases: A real-world study.

发表日期:2023 Jan 16
作者: Thibaut Sanglier, Jinjoo Shim, Neil Lamarre, Claudia Peña-Murillo, Vincent Antao, Filippo Montemurro
来源: BREAST

摘要:

曲妥珠单抗乳酸甲氧基乙酯(T-DM1)已经证明在患有乳腺癌脑转移的患者中能够改善生存和神经症状。这项实际研究调查了T-DM1与拉帕替尼加卡培他滨(LC)在乳腺癌脑转移患者中的有效性。此项回顾性观察研究使用真实世界数据库评估了HER2阳性乳腺癌脑转移患者。符合条件的患者在之前被诊断出脑转移之前,已经接受了T-DM1或LC,并且接受过至少一次转移性乳腺癌治疗。主要终点是总生存率(OS);次要终点是下一个相关治疗或死亡的时间(TTNT)和真实世界进展无瘤生存期(rwPFS)。使用逆概率处理权重(IPTW)方法以考虑治疗组之间的潜在基线特征差异。结果使用Kaplan-Meier方法描述,并使用加权Cox比例风险模型和风险比(HR)估计开始使用T-DM1与LC的平均治疗效果。共有214名患者可供分析(T-DM1,n = 161;LC,n = 53)。经过加权处理,治疗组之间的人口统计学和基线特征基本平衡。加权处理后,中位OS为17.7(T-DM1)与9.6(LC)个月(HR,0.55 [95% CI,0.34-0.89];P = 0.013)。中位TTNT为9.0(T-DM1)与6.0(LC)个月(HR,0.55 [95% CI,0.36-0.85];P = 0.005)。加权处理后,中位rwPFS为6.0(T-DM1)与4.0(LC)个月(HR,0.50 [95% CI,0.36-0.69];P < 0.001)。这些结果支持T-DM1与LC在真实世界中在HER2阳性乳腺癌脑转移患者中的明显有效性和临床相关性。版权所有 © 2023作者。由爱思唯尔出版社发表。保留所有权利。
Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) has demonstrated improvements in survival and neurological symptoms in patients with breast cancer with brain metastases (BCBM). This real-world study investigated the effectiveness of T-DM1 versus lapatinib plus capecitabine (LC) in patients with BCBM.This retrospective, observational study evaluated patients with HER2-positive BCBM using a real-world database. Eligible patients had initiated T-DM1 or LC with a prior diagnosis of brain metastasis and ≥1 prior metastatic breast cancer treatment. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were time to next relevant treatment or death (TTNT) and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS). An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) approach was used to account for differences in potential baseline characteristics between treatment groups. Outcomes were described using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the average treatment effect of initiating T-DM1 versus LC was estimated using weighted Cox proportional hazard models and hazard ratio (HR).A total of 214 patients were available for analysis (T-DM1, n = 161; LC, n = 53). Demographics and baseline characteristics were generally well-balanced between treatment groups after weighting. After weighting, median OS was 17.7 (T-DM1) versus 9.6 (LC) months (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.34-0.89]; P=0.013). Median TTNT was 9.0 (T-DM1) versus 6.0 (LC) months (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.36-0.85]; P = 0.005). After weighting, median rwPFS was 6.0 (T-DM1) versus 4.0 (LC) months (HR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.36-0.69]; P < 0.001).These results support the superior effectiveness and clinical relevance of T-DM1 versus LC in patients with HER2-positive BCBM in the real world.Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.