胆囊十二指肠切除术通过术前经内镜超声引导下胆总管十二指肠吻合术比经穿孔管放置支架更适用:一项ACHBT-FRENCH-SFED小组的多中心比较队列研究。
Pancreatoduodenectomy Following Preoperative Biliary Drainage Using Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Choledochoduodenostomy Versus a Transpapillary Stent: A Multicenter Comparative Cohort Study of the ACHBT-FRENCH-SFED Intergroup.
发表日期:2023 Apr 17
作者:
Julien Janet, Jeremie Albouys, Bertrand Napoleon, Jeremie Jacques, Muriel Mathonnet, Julien Magne, Marie Fontaine, Charles de Ponthaud, Sylvaine Durand Fontanier, Sylvia S M Bardet, Raphael Bourdariat, Laurent Sulpice, Mickael Lesurtel, Romain Legros, Stephanie Truant, Fabien Robin, Frédéric Prat, Maxime Palazzo, Lilian Schwarz, Emmanuel Buc, Alain Sauvanet, Sebastien Gaujoux, Abdelkader Taibi
来源:
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
摘要:
在胰十二指肠切除术(PD)前,内窥镜逆行胆管胰管造影术(ERCP)行术前胆管引流(PBD)是否等同于电灼增强腔内嵌金属支架(ECE-LAMS)目前尚不清楚。 于2015年至2022年间,在九个专家中心进行了回顾性研究,将行PD的远端恶性胆管梗阻(DMBO)病人纳入研究。进行了ERCP或内窥超声引导的胆总管十二指肠吻合术并放置ECE-LAMS。在意图治疗分析中,将使用ECE-LAMS引流的患者视为研究组(第一LAMS组),而使用传统经导管置入支架引流的患者则为对照组(第一穿刺组)。分析了技术成功率、临床成功率、引流相关并发症、手术并发症和肿瘤结果等因素。在156名患者中,128名接受了ERCP,28名首次进行了ECE-LAMS。第一穿刺组的技术成功率和临床成功率分别为83.5%和70.2%,而第一LAMS组则为100%和89.3%(分别为p = 0.02和p = 0.05)。在整个患者旅程中,第一穿刺组的总并发症率为93.7%,而第一LAMS组为92.0%(p = 0.04)。第一穿刺组的整体内镜并发症率为30.5%,而第一LAMS组为17.9%(p = 0.25)。PD后的总体并发症率在第一穿刺组中高于第一LAMS组(92.2%与75.0%,p = 0.016)。两组的总体生存率和无进展生存率没有差异。PBD与ECE-LAMS在DMBO患者中部署更容易、更有效。在不损害肿瘤结果的情况下,它可减少胰十二指肠切除术后手术并发症的发生率。©2023年,外科肿瘤学会。
It is unclear whether preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is equivalent to electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stent (ECE-LAMS) before pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).Patients who underwent PBD for distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO) followed by PD were retrospectively included in nine expert centers between 2015 and 2022. ERCP or endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy with ECE-LAMS were performed. In intent-to-treat analysis, patients drained with ECE-LAMS were considered the study group (first-LAMS group) and those drained with conventional transpapillary stent the control group (first-cannulation group). The rates of technical success, clinical success, drainage-related complications, surgical complications, and oncological outcomes were analyzed.Among 156 patients, 128 underwent ERCP and 28 ECE-LAMS in first intent. The technical and clinical success rates were 83.5% and 70.2% in the first-cannulation group versus 100% and 89.3% in the first-LAMS group (p = 0.02 and p = 0.05, respectively). The overall complication rate over the entire patient journey was 93.7% in first-cannulation group versus 92.0% in first-LAMS group (p = 0.04). The overall endoscopic complication rate was 30.5% in first-cannulation group versus 17.9% in first-LAMS group (p = 0.25). The overall complication rate after PD was higher in the first-cannulation group than in the first-LAMS group (92.2% versus 75.0%, p = 0.016). Overall survival and progression-free survival did not differ between the groups.PBD with ECE-LAMS is easier to deploy and more efficient than ERCP in patients with DMBO. It is associated with less surgical complications after pancreatoduodenectomy without compromising the oncological outcome.© 2023. Society of Surgical Oncology.