研究动态
Articles below are published ahead of final publication in an issue. Please cite articles in the following format: authors, (year), title, journal, DOI.

密集疗法可改善新诊断的晚期非淋巴结NK/T细胞淋巴瘤的长期生存:一项多机构的真实世界研究。

Intensive therapy can improve long-term survival in newly diagnosed, advanced-stage extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: A multi-institutional, real-world study.

发表日期:2023 Aug 04
作者: Yu-Ce Wei, Fei Qi, Bao-Min Zheng, Chang-Gong Zhang, Yan Xie, Bo Chen, Wei-Xin Liu, Wei-Ping Liu, Hui Fang, Shu-Nan Qi, Di Zhang, Yue Chai, Ye-Xiong Li, Wei-Hu Wang, Yu-Qin Song, Jun Zhu, Mei Dong
来源: Stem Cell Research & Therapy

摘要:

本研究调查了晚期非淋巴结型自然杀伤/ T细胞淋巴瘤(ENKTL)的治疗与预后。在中位随访时间为75.03个月的情况下,对195例新诊断的III/IV期ENKTL患者,中位总生存期(mOS)为19.43个月,预计的1年、2年、3年和5年总生存率分别为59.5%、46.3%、41.8%和35.1%。化疗(CT)+放疗(RT)与单独化疗(CT)相比(P=0.007),造血干细胞移植(HSCT)与无HSCT相比(P<0.001),都能提高总生存期。对于60岁及以下不适宜进行HSCT的患者,其他完全缓解的治疗可导致可比较的总生存期(P=0.141)。曾接受过奇达米德治疗的9例患者实现了中位无进展生存期(mPFS)和中位总生存期(mOS)分别为53.63个月(范围,3.47-92.33个月)和54.80个月(范围,5.50-95.70个月),而4例接受奇达米德维持治疗(MT)的患者实现了mPFS和mOS分别为55.83个月(范围,53.27-92.33个月)和60.65个月(范围,53.70-95.70个月),这可能为非HSCT患者提供了另一种选择。非蒽环素(ANT)-与ANT-、阿斯帕拉金酸酶(Aspa)-与非Aspa-以及吉西他滨(Gem)-与非Gem-基治疗相比,分别延长了进展无病生存期(P=0.031;P=0.005;P=0.009)和总生存期(P=0.010;P=0.086;P=0.003)。多变量分析表明,Gem-基治疗改善了进展无病生存期(HR=0.691,P=0.061)和总生存期(HR=0.624,P=0.037)。与仅含有Gem或Aspa的方案相比,Gem + Aspa联合方案稍微改善了进展无病生存期和总生存期(P>0.05)。提出了“强化疗法”的一线治疗方案,包括化疗(特别是Gem + Aspa方案)、放疗、HSCT和替代奇达米德MT,并且可以改善晚期ENKTL的长期生存。进行中的前瞻性临床研究可能进一步揭示奇达米德MT的价值。© 2023 UICC.
The study investigated the treatment and prognosis of advanced-stage extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL). With a median follow-up of 75.03 months, the median overall survival (mOS) for the 195 newly diagnosed stage III/IV ENKTL patients was 19.43 months, and estimated 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year OS were 59.5%, 46.3%, 41.8% and 35.1%, respectively. Chemotherapy (CT) + radiotherapy (RT) compared to CT alone (P = .007), and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) compared to non-HSCT (P < .001), both improved OS. For patients ≤60 years and ineligible for HSCT, other therapies with complete remission led to comparable OS (P = .141). Nine patients ever treated with chidamide achieved a median progression-free survival (mPFS) and mOS of 53.63 (range, 3.47-92.33) and 54.80 (range, 5.50-95.70) months, and four with chidamide maintenance therapy (MT) achieved a mPFS and mOS of 55.83 (range, 53.27-92.33) and 60.65 (range, 53.70-95.70) months, possibly providing an alternative option for non-HSCT patients. Non-anthracycline (ANT)- compared to ANT-, asparaginase (Aspa)- compared to non-Aspa- and gemcitabine (Gem)- compared to non-Gem-based regimens, prolonged PFS (P = .031; P = .005; P = .009) and OS (P = .010; P = .086; P = .003), respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that Gem-based regimens improved PFS (HR = 0.691, P = .061) and OS (HR = 0.624, P = .037). Gem + Aspa combinations slightly improved PFS and OS compared to regimens containing Gem or Aspa alone (P > 0.05). First-line "intensive therapy," including CT (particularly Gem + Aspa regimens), RT, HSCT and alternative chidamide MT, was proposed and could improve long-term survival for advanced-stage ENKTLs. Ongoing prospective clinical studies may shed further light on the value of chidamide MT.© 2023 UICC.