幽门螺杆菌阴性患者中,鳞状胃腺瘤和胃增生性息肉之间的内窥镜鉴别诊断。
Endoscopic differential diagnosis between foveolar-type gastric adenoma and gastric hyperplastic polyps in Helicobacter pylori-naïve patients.
发表日期:2023 Aug 06
作者:
Kotaro Shibagaki, Norihisa Ishimura, Satoshi Kotani, Chika Fukuyama, Yusuke Takahashi, Kenichi Kishimoto, Tomotaka Yazaki, Masatoshi Kataoka, Taisuke Omachi, Yasuhito Kinoshita, Nobuaki Hasegawa, Akihiko Oka, Yoshiyuki Mishima, Tsuyoshi Mishiro, Naoki Oshima, Kousaku Kawashima, Mamiko Nagase, Asuka Araki, Kyuichi Kadota, Shunji Ishihara
来源:
Gastric Cancer
摘要:
腺窦型胃腺瘤(FGA)发生在Helicobacter pylori(Hp)未感染个体中,并在形态上模拟未感染Hp的胃占位性增生息肉(HpN-GHP)。由于其低级别组织学异型性,FGA即使通过活检也常难以与HpN-GHP区分。我们进行了一项回顾性的研究,以建立一种内窥镜诊断指标。我们分析了41名患者的51个FGA和24名患者的36个HpN-GHP。所有病变均通过白光内窥镜(WLE)和放大内窥镜的狭带成像(NBIME)拍摄。三名专家和三名非专家分别评估了WLE和WLE+NBIME图像的六个病变诊断项目。我们分析了诊断项目和组织学特征之间的相关性,并比较了不同方式的诊断准确性。我们创建了一个综合诊断指数,并计算了其准确性和一致性。与HpN-GHP相比,FGA更常显示如下特征:明亮红色(94.1%对44.4%),外周增生(58.8%对8.3%),乳头/回旋样微结构(96.1%对33.3%),可见毛细血管(70.6%对38.9%)和界限线(98.0%对41.7%)(P < 0.05).白区增厚仅在HpN-GHP中出现(52.8%)。专家的诊断准确度(WLE vs. WLE+NBIME的平均值)分别为90.8 ± 1.1%和93.5 ± 2.4%(P = 0.15),非专家为88.5 ± 3.0%和86.6 ± 3.5%(P = 0.51)。当满足四个标准(明亮红色、乳头/回旋样微结构、界限线和无白区增厚)时,FGA的敏感性和特异性分别为90.2%和94.4%,观察者间诊断一致性的kappa值≥0.6。综合诊断指数有助于FGA和HpN-GHP的可重复性、准确性的术前鉴别诊断。© 2023年,作者(s)在The International Gastric Cancer Association和The Japanese Gastric Cancer Association拥有独家许可。
Foveolar-type gastric adenoma (FGA) occurs in Helicobacter pylori (Hp)-naïve individuals and morphologically mimics Hp-naïve gastric hyperplastic polyp (HpN-GHP). FGA is often difficult to distinguish from HpN-GHP even by biopsy, due to its low-grade histologic atypia. We conducted a retrospective study to create an endoscopic diagnostic index.We analyzed 51 FGAs in 41 patients and 36 HpN-GHPs in 24 patients. All lesions were photographed by white-light endoscopy (WLE) and narrow-band imaging with magnification endoscopy (NBIME). Three experts and three non-experts reviewed the WLE and WLE+NBIME images to assess six items for lesion diagnosis. We analyzed correlations between the diagnostic items and histologic features and compared the diagnostic accuracy between modalities. We created a composite diagnostic index and calculated its accuracy and consistency.FGAs more frequently showed the following features vs. HpN-GHPs: bright-red color (94.1% vs. 44.4%), peripheral hyperplasia (58.8% vs. 8.3%), papillary/gyrus-like microstructure (96.1% vs. 33.3%), visible capillaries (70.6% vs. 38.9%), and demarcation line (98.0% vs. 41.7%) (P < 0.05). White-zone thickening was seen only in HpN-GHPs (52.8%). Diagnostic accuracy (mean, WLE vs. WLE+NBIME) was 90.8 ± 1.1% vs. 93.5 ± 2.4% (P = 0.15) for experts and 88.5 ± 3.0% vs. 86.6 ± 3.5% (P = 0.51) for non-experts. When satisfying the four criteria (bright-red color, papillary/gyrus-like microstructure, demarcation line, and absent white-zone thickening), sensitivity and specificity for FGA were 90.2% and 94.4%, respectively, with a kappa value of ≥ 0.6 for interobserver diagnostic agreement.Composite diagnostic index contributes to the reproducible, accurate, preoperative differential diagnosis of FGA and HpN-GHP.© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to The International Gastric Cancer Association and The Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.