第二种生物制剂在类风湿性关节炎患者中的药物疗效和持续性是否受到失败类型和选择的影响?
Does the Type of Failure and the Choice of the Second Biologic Influence Response and Persistence on Medication in Rheumatoid Arthritis?
发表日期:2023 Aug 30
作者:
Louis Bessette, Mohammad Movahedi, George Reed, Joel M Kremer, Kevin Kane, Edward Keystone
来源:
ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY
摘要:
失败类型可能预测对第二种生物制剂的反应。我们评估了接受第二种肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)或非TNFi治疗的患者对初始TNFi治疗失败的反应,无论是初级失败还是继发性失败。研究对象为类风湿性关节炎患者,没有接受过生物制剂治疗,且临床疾病活动指数(CDAI)>10,先开始使用第一种TNFi治疗≥3个月,然后转为使用第二种生物制剂。继发性失败的定义为患者连续两次CDAI较低后,持续处于中度/重度CDAI状态下转换为第二种生物制剂。初级失败的定义是指没有满足继发性失败的定义,或在治疗3个月后至少有1次中度/重度CDAI的情况。我们采用多变量逻辑回归分析比较初级与继发性失败在转换后6个月达到CDAI≤10(主要结局)和达到最小临床重要差异(次要结局)的比率。
共有462名患者纳入研究,64.3%因初级失败而停用第一种TNFi,35.7%因继发性失败而停用。初级失败患者疾病更为严重(CDAI平均值26.39 vs. 21.61;p < 0.001)。无论选择第二种药物,继发性失败患者达到CDAI≤10(优势比4.367;95%置信区间2.428-7.856)和实现最小临床重要差异(优势比2.851;95%置信区间1.619-5.020)的可能性显著高于初级失败患者。
与初级失败患者相比,对第一种TNFi失败的类风湿性关节炎患者对第二种生物制剂的反应更好,无论选择哪种生物制剂。
© 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 保留所有权利。
The type of failure may predict response to a second biologic. We evaluated the response to a second tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) or non-TNFi in patients failing their initial TNFi, either primarily or secondarily.Patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were biologic-naive and had a Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) >10, who started their first TNFi for ≥3 months and then switched to a second biologic, were included in the study. Secondary failure was defined as 2 consecutive low-CDAI visits and then switching to a second biologic while they had moderate/severe CDAI. Primary failure was defined if it did not meet the definition of secondary failure, or if they had at least 1 moderate/severe CDAI after 3 months on treatment. We used multivariable logistic regression comparing primary versus secondary failure for achievement of CDAI ≤10 (primary outcome) and minimal clinically important differences (secondary outcome) at 6 months after switch.Of the 462 patients included, 64.3% and 35.7% stopped the first TNFi because of a primary and secondary failure, respectively. Patients with primary failure had a more severe disease (CDAI mean, 26.39 vs. 21.61; p < 0.001). The likelihood of achieving CDAI ≤10 (odds ratio, 4.367; 95% confidence interval, 2.428-7.856) and minimal clinically important difference (odds ratio, 2.851; 95% confidence interval, 1.619-5.020) was significantly higher for secondary than primary failure regardless of choice of a second agent.Patients with rheumatoid arthritis with secondary failure to a first TNFi responded better to a second biologic agent, regardless of the choice of biologic.Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.