研究动态
Articles below are published ahead of final publication in an issue. Please cite articles in the following format: authors, (year), title, journal, DOI.

对危险因素进行分类的评分系统,用于评估脑肿瘤切除后儿科患者是否需要脑室腹腔分流术。

A scoring system categorizing risk factors to evaluate the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunt in pediatric patients after brain tumor resection.

发表日期:2023
作者: Zhong-Yin Guo, Zi-An Zhong, Peng Peng, Yang Liu, Feng Chen
来源: Brain Structure & Function

摘要:

开发一个基于儿科患者脑肿瘤切除术后是否需要脑室腹腔分流术(VP)分流的独立预测因素的评分系统。共有 416 名接受手术的脑肿瘤儿科患者(≤ 14 岁)被随机分配参加培训(n = 333) 和验证队列 (n = 83)。根据 VP 分流的实施情况,将训练队列分为 VP 分流组(n = 35)和非 VP 分流组(n = 298)。进行了单变量和多变量逻辑分析。根据临床特征和手术数据制定评分系统,计算评分和相应的风险。年龄<3(p = 0.010,比值比[OR] = 3.162),失血量(BL)(p = 0.005,OR = 1.300)、中线肿瘤位置(p < 0.001,OR = 5.750)、术前脑积水(p = 0.001,OR = 7.044)和全切除(p = 0.025,OR = 0.284)被确定为独立预测因素。评分系统的曲线下面积(AUC)高于年龄<3、BL、中线肿瘤位置、术前脑积水和全切除组(分别为0.859 vs. 0.598、0.717、0.725、0.705和0.555; p < 0.001)。此外,评分系统在验证队列中表现出良好的性能(AUC = 0.971)。预测评分的截止值为 5.5 分,将患者分为低风险(0-5 分)和高风险(6-14 分)组。我们的评分系统,整合年龄 < 3、BL、中线肿瘤位置、术前脑积水和全切除提供了实用的评估。分数范围从 6 到 14 分表示高风险。版权所有 © 2023 郭、钟、彭、刘和陈。
To develop a scoring system based on independent predictors of the need for ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt after brain tumor resection in pediatric patients.A total of 416 pediatric patients (≤ 14 years old) with brain tumors who underwent surgery were randomly assigned to the training (n = 333) and validation cohorts (n = 83). Based on the implementation of VP shunt, the training cohort was divided into the VP shunt group (n = 35) and the non-VP shunt group (n = 298). Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were performed. A scoring system was developed based on clinical characteristics and operative data, and scores and corresponding risks were calculated.Age < 3 (p = 0.010, odds ratio [OR] = 3.162), blood loss (BL) (p = 0.005, OR = 1.300), midline tumor location (p < 0.001, OR = 5.750), preoperative hydrocephalus (p = 0.001, OR = 7.044), and total resection (p = 0.025, OR = 0.284) were identified as independent predictors. The area under the curve (AUC) of the scoring system was higher than those of age < 3, BL, midline tumor location, preoperative hydrocephalus, and total resection (0.859 vs. 0.598, 0.717, 0.725, 0.705, and 0.555, respectively; p < 0.001). Furthermore, the scoring system showed good performance in the validation cohort (AUC = 0.971). The cutoff value for predictive scores was 5.5 points, which categorized patients into low risk (0-5 points) and high risk (6-14 points) groups.Our scoring system, integrating age < 3, BL, midline tumor location, preoperative hydrocephalus, and total resection, provides a practical evaluation. Scores ranging from 6 to 14 points indicate high risk.Copyright © 2023 Guo, Zhong, Peng, Liu and Chen.