拟议的贝伐单抗生物仿制药 BAT1706 与参考贝伐单抗相比,在晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌患者中的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、III 期研究。
Efficacy and safety of the proposed bevacizumab biosimilar BAT1706 compared with reference bevacizumab in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: A randomized, double-blind, phase III study.
发表日期:2023 Nov 07
作者:
Likun Chen, Jose David Gomez Rangel, Timucin Cil, Xingya Li, Irfan Cicin, Yihong Shen, Zhihua Liu, Ozgur Ozyilkan, Bondarenko Igor, Jun Chen, Kostiuk Oleksandr, Zhendong Chen, Helong Zhang, Ziyi Fu, Qingfeng Dong, Shuqiang Song, Jin-Chen Yu, Li Zhang
来源:
Food & Function
摘要:
BAT1706 是贝伐珠单抗 (Avastin®) 的拟议生物仿制药。我们的目的是比较 BAT1706 与欧盟参比贝伐单抗 (EU-bevacizumab) 在晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌 (NSCLC) 患者中的疗效和安全性。患者按 1:1 随机分配至 BAT1706 加紫杉醇和卡铂组(BAT1706 组)或 EU-贝伐单抗加紫杉醇和卡铂(EU-贝伐单抗组)每 3 周一次,持续六个周期,然后用 BAT1706 或 EU-贝伐单抗维持治疗。主要终点是第 18 周的总体缓解率 (ORR18)。如果 BAT1706:EU-贝伐珠单抗 ORR18 风险比的 90% 置信区间 (CI) 包含在 0.75-1.33(中国国家药品监督管理局要求)或 0.73-1.36(美国食品药品监督管理局要求)的预定义等效范围内,则证明临床等效性和药物管理局),或者如果治疗之间 ORR18 风险差异的 95% CI 包含在 -0.12 至 0.15 的预定义等效边界内(EMA 要求)。总共 649 名随机患者(BAT1706,n = 325;EU-贝伐珠单抗,n = 324)接受了至少一个周期的联合治疗。 BAT1706 组和 EU-贝伐单抗组之间的 ORR18 相当(分别为 48.0% 和 44.5%)。 ORR18 风险比为 1.08(90% CI:0.94-1.24),ORR18 风险差为 0.03(95% CI:-0.04 至 0.11),均在预定义的等效范围内,证明了 BAT1706 和 EU-贝伐珠单抗的生物相似性。 BAT1706 的安全性与 EU-贝伐单抗一致,未观察到新的安全信号。在晚期非鳞状 NSCLC 患者中,BAT1706 在疗效、安全性、药代动力学和免疫原性方面与 EU-贝伐单抗具有临床等效性。© 2023作者们。约翰·威利出版的癌症医学
BAT1706 is a proposed biosimilar of bevacizumab (Avastin®). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of BAT1706 with that of EU-sourced reference bevacizumab (EU-bevacizumab) in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients were randomized 1:1 to BAT1706 plus paclitaxel and carboplatin (BAT1706 arm) or EU-bevacizumab plus paclitaxel and carboplatin (EU-bevacizumab arm) given every 3 weeks for six cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with BAT1706 or EU-bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was overall response rate at week 18 (ORR18 ). Clinical equivalence was demonstrated if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the BAT1706:EU-bevacizumab ORR18 risk ratio was contained within the predefined equivalence margins of 0.75-1.33 (China National Medical Products Administration requirements), or 0.73-1.36 (US Food and Drug Administration), or if the 95% CI of the ORR18 risk difference between treatments was contained within the predefined equivalence margin of -0.12 to 0.15 (EMA requirements).In total, 649 randomized patients (BAT1706, n = 325; EU-bevacizumab, n = 324) received at least one cycle of combination treatment. The ORR18 was comparable between the BAT1706 and EU-bevacizumab arms (48.0% and 44.5%, respectively). The ORR18 risk ratio of 1.08 (90% CI: 0.94-1.24) and the ORR18 risk difference of 0.03 (95% CI: -0.04 to 0.11) were within the predefined equivalence margins, demonstrating the biosimilarity of BAT1706 and EU-bevacizumab. The safety profile of BAT1706 was consistent with that of EU-bevacizumab and no new safety signals were observed.In patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC, BAT1706 demonstrated clinical equivalence to EU-bevacizumab in terms of efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity.© 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.