研究动态
Articles below are published ahead of final publication in an issue. Please cite articles in the following format: authors, (year), title, journal, DOI.

决策影响分析测量分子特征反应分类器测试对类风湿关节炎治疗选择的影响。

Decision Impact Analysis to Measure the Influence of Molecular Signature Response Classifier Testing on Treatment Selection in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

发表日期:2023 Nov 10
作者: Jeffrey R Curtis, Vibeke Strand, Steven J Golombek, George A Karpouzas, Lixia Zhang, Angus Wong, Krishna Patel, Jennifer Dines, Viatcheslav R Akmaev
来源: MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS

摘要:

类风湿关节炎 (RA) 患者对传统合成缓解病情抗风湿药物 (csDMARD) 反应不足,因此临床指南对治疗选择几乎没有提供指导。分子特征反应分类器 (MSRC) 经验证可预测肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂 (TNFi) 的反应不足。评估了 MSRC 结果对生物制剂和靶向合成缓解病情抗风湿药物 (b/tsDMARD) 选择的决策影响。这是对 AIMS 的分析,AIMS 是使用 MSRC 测试的 RA 患者的纵向前瞻性数据库。本研究通过调查医生评估了 MSRC 测试后 b/tsDMARD 类别的选择、b/tsDMARD 处方与 MSRC 结果一致的比例,以及医生利用 MSRC 结果进行决策的百分比。在 1018 名参与者中,70.7%(720/ 1018) 在收到 MSRC 结果后选择了治疗。在这个获悉 MSRC 的队列中,75.6% (544/720) 的患者接受了与 MSRC 结果一致的 b/tsDMARD,84.6% (609/720) 的提供者报告使用 MSRC 结果来指导治疗选择。未将治疗选择与总队列中的 MSRC 结果保持一致的最常见原因(8.2%,59/720)是健康保险覆盖问题。这项研究表明,风湿病学家报告使用 MSRC 测试来指导患有以下疾病的患者选择 b/tsDMARD RA。根据医生的自我报告,在大多数情况下,MSRC 测试结果似乎会影响临床决策。更广泛地采用 MSRC 等精准医疗工具可以支持风湿病学家和患者共同努力,以实现 RA 的最佳结果。© 2023。作者。
Clinical guidelines offer little guidance for treatment selection following inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A molecular signature response classifier (MSRC) was validated to predict tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) inadequate response. The decision impact of MSRC results on biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b/tsDMARD) selection was evaluated.This is an analysis of AIMS, a longitudinal, prospective database of patients with RA tested using the MSRC. This study assessed selection of b/tsDMARDs class after MSRC testing by surveying physicians, the rate of b/tsDMARD prescriptions aligning with MSRC results, and the percentage of physicians utilizing MSRC results for decision-making.Of 1018 participants, 70.7% (720/1018) had treatment selected after receiving MSRC results. In this MSRC-informed cohort, 75.6% (544/720) of patients received a b/tsDMARD aligned with MSRC results, and 84.6% (609/720) of providers reported using MSRC results to guide treatment selection. The most prevalent reason reported (8.2%, 59/720) for not aligning treatment selection with MSRC results from the total cohort was health insurance coverage issues.This study showed that rheumatologists reported using the MSRC test to guide b/tsDMARD selection for patients with RA. In most cases, MSRC test results appeared to influence clinical decision-making according to physician self-report. Wider adoption of precision medicine tools like the MSRC could support rheumatologists and patients in working together to achieve optimal outcomes for RA.© 2023. The Author(s).