新辅助纳武单抗联合化疗与传统比较治疗在可切除非小细胞肺癌中的疗效比较:系统文献综述和网络荟萃分析。
Comparative Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy versus Conventional Comparator Treatments in Resectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
发表日期:2024 Jul 08
作者:
Nicolas Girard, Mariam Besada, Basia Rogula, Stefano Lucherini, Lien Vo, Mohammad A Chaudhary, Sarah Goring, Greta Lozano-Ortega, Mia Tran, Nebibe Varol, Nathalie Waser, Jay M Lee, Jonathan Spicer
来源:
Cancers
摘要:
本研究旨在评估新辅助纳武单抗联合化疗 (neoNIVO CT) 与可切除非转移性非小细胞肺癌 (rNSCLC) 患者中相关治疗的相对疗效。治疗比较基于网络荟萃分析(NMA)使用通过系统文献综述(SLR)确定的随机临床试验数据。感兴趣的结果是无事件生存期(EFS)和病理完全缓解(pCR)。 NeoNIVO CT 与新辅助化疗 (neoCT)、新辅助放化疗 (neoCRT)、辅助化疗 (adjCT) 和单纯手术 (S) 进行了比较。由于可能按阶段修改效果,因此考虑了所有阶段和特定阶段的网络。运行固定效应 (FE) 和随机效应贝叶斯 NMA 模型(EFS = 风险比 [HR];pCR = 优势比 [OR];95% 可信区间 [CrI])。确定了 61 个 RCT(基本案例) = 9 项随机对照试验 [n = 1978 名患者])。在全阶段 FE 模型中,neoNIVO CT 相对于 neoCT 的 EFS 改善具有统计学意义(HR = 0.68 [95% CrI:0.49, 0.94])、S(0.59 [0.42, 0.82])、adjCT(0.66 [0.45, 0.96]) ]),但与 neoCRT 无关(HR = 0.77 [0.52, 1.16])。相对于 neoCT (OR = 12.53 [5.60, 33.82]) 和 neoCRT (7.15 [2.31, 24.34]),NeoNIVO CT (5 个 RCT) 的 pCR 几率具有统计学意义更高。阶段特异性模型结果是一致的。该 NMA 信号表明,与 rNSCLC 患者中的比较者相比,neoNIVO CT 的 EFS 和/或 pCR 有所改善。
This study aimed to estimate the relative efficacy of neoadjuvant nivolumab in combination with chemotherapy (neoNIVO + CT) compared to relevant treatments amongst resectable non-metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (rNSCLC) patients.Treatment comparisons were based on a network meta-analysis (NMA) using randomized clinical trial data identified via systematic literature review (SLR). The outcomes of interest were event-free survival (EFS) and pathological complete response (pCR). NeoNIVO + CT was compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neoCT), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neoCRT), adjuvant chemotherapy (adjCT), and surgery alone (S). Due to the potential for effect modification by stage, all-stage and stage-specific networks were considered. Fixed-effect (FE) and random-effects Bayesian NMA models were run (EFS = hazard ratios [HR]; pCR = odds ratios [OR]; 95% credible intervals [CrI]).Sixty-one RCTs were identified (base case = 9 RCTs [n = 1978 patients]). In the all-stages FE model, neoNIVO + CT had statistically significant EFS improvements relative to neoCT (HR = 0.68 [95% CrI: 0.49, 0.94]), S (0.59 [0.42, 0.82]), adjCT (0.66 [0.45, 0.96]), but not relative to neoCRT (HR = 0.77 [0.52, 1.16]). NeoNIVO + CT (5 RCTs) had statistically significant higher odds of pCR relative to neoCT (OR = 12.53 [5.60, 33.82]) and neoCRT (7.15 [2.31, 24.34]). Stage-specific model findings were consistent.This NMA signals improved EFS and/or pCR of neoNIVO + CT relative to comparators among patients with rNSCLC.