研究动态
Articles below are published ahead of final publication in an issue. Please cite articles in the following format: authors, (year), title, journal, DOI.

血液学癌症中的可测量残留病灶 (MRD) 检测:是巨大的飞跃还是横向飞跃?

Measurable residual disease (MRD)-testing in haematological cancers: A giant leap forward or sideways?

发表日期:2024 Aug 09
作者: Qiujin Shen, Xiaowen Gong, Yahui Feng, Yu Hu, Tiantian Wang, Wen Yan, Wei Zhang, Saibing Qi, Robert Peter Gale, Junren Chen
来源: BLOOD REVIEWS

摘要:

可测量残留病灶 (MRD) 检测用于许多血液学癌症,以估计复发风险并指导治疗。有时 MRD 测试结果用于监管部门的批准。然而,包括监管机构在内的一些人错误地认为 MRD 检测结果高度准确,并且在指导治疗方面已被证实有效。我们回顾了 MRD 检测技术,并评估了 MRD 检测预测复发的准确性以及支持 MRD 指导治疗功效的证据强度。我们表明,在个体水平上,MRD 检测结果通常是不准确的复发预测因子。此外,没有令人信服的数据表明基于阳性 MRD 测试增加治疗强度可以降低复发风险或提高生存率。我们警告不要仅根据 MRD 检测结果调整治疗强度。版权所有 © 2024 作者。由爱思唯尔有限公司出版。保留所有权利。
Measurable residual disease (MRD)-testing is used in many haematological cancers to estimate relapse risk and to direct therapy. Sometimes MRD-test results are used for regulatory approval. However, some people including regulators wrongfully believe results of MRD-testing are highly accurate and of proven efficacy in directing therapy. We review MRD-testing technologies and evaluate the accuracy of MRD-testing for predicting relapse and the strength of evidence supporting efficacy of MRD-guided therapy. We show that at the individual level MRD-test results are often an inaccurate relapse predictor. Also, no convincing data indicate that increasing therapy-intensity based on a positive MRD-test reduces relapse risk or improves survival. We caution against adjusting therapy-intensity based solely on results of MRD-testing.Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.